Hi Harm, Hi Thomas, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: > > > So far as I can observe the calculations isn't exact: with higher or > > lower staff-size values it goes increasingly wrong. > > Did I something wrong while tranforming your calculation into scheme? >
Looks fine to me. 2013/7/10 David Kastrup <[email protected]> > > I think the above is just a curve fitting, not a model of what LilyPond > actually does. So it's not surprising it goes wrong for larger/smaller > values. Right. Well as a first step I wanted to find a correcting parameter but it looks weird. (see enclosed). So I think I'm looking into a wrong direction. Yesterday evening (looking at the beach sunset...) I was thinking that, thanks to the stability of the Y-height (4.0) maybe we would find more acurated figures of the x-length if calculated after the hypotenuse. \version "2.17.21" #(set-global-staff-size 20) \paper { ragged-right = ##t } % Better viewing \layout { \override Score.RehearsalMark #'color = #red \override Score.RehearsalMark #'layer = #10 %%%% Y-offset is slightly staff-size related \override Score.RehearsalMark #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -4.845) } { R1 \mark \markup \draw-line #'(0 . 4) \override Staff.BarLine.kern = #1 \bar "||" R1 } { R1 \mark \markup \draw-line #'(0 . 4) \override Staff.BarLine.kern = #2 \bar "||" R1 } { R1 \mark \markup \draw-line #'(0 . 4) \override Staff.BarLine.kern = #10 \bar "||" R1 } { R1 \mark \markup \draw-line #'(0 . 4) \override Staff.BarLine.kern = #20 \bar "||" R1 } { R1 \mark \markup \draw-line #'(0 . 4) \override Staff.BarLine.kern = #50 \bar "||" R1 } I've started some calculation without real success so far. So here we are. Any other idea ?
<<attachment: x-length-corr.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
