On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:12 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > Am 23.07.2013 15:09, schrieb Richard Shann: > > On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:03 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > >> Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard Shann: > >> > >>> I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared > >>> with those of well-known alternatives: > >>> > >>> http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters > >>> > >>> If anyone can provide better examples - these are just taken from > >>> published work that I could find with a quick search - then please let > >>> me know - especially if I am not doing LilyPond justice. > >>> My examples have a common origin in MusicXML files, but there may be > >>> some other way of standardizing the comparisons (short of re-typing > >>> music examples...). > >>> > >>> Richard > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> lilypond-user mailing list > >>> lilypond-user@gnu.org > >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > >> What about the LilyPond and Finale renderings on that page: > >> http://lilypond.ursliska.de/notensatz/lilypond-tutorials/tackle-complex-tasks/part-2-improving-the-output.html? > > Reading this page I see you refer to "the model" but it is not so clear > > what this is > In this case the printed score from which I typeset the example with > LilyPond and someone else with Finale 2008.
Ah, I see, you are able to talk about "Enter the plain music, correctly assign voices and don't apply any manual corrections" in the context of Finale - with many such programs you cannot certain markings or text without manually positioning it, it just floats at the end of the mouse pointer until you click. Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
