Alan McConnell <[email protected]> writes: >> > The '^' marks the dot on the dotted Bb that I wish >> > to move into the next bar. The part compiles just >> > fine; >> >> No, it doesn't. > <G> Not the above excerpt, for sure. But the > part from which this is taken compiles fine; > I've printed out the resulting .pdf and friends > here in Silver Spring and in Los Angeles have > played them.
This is nice, but the purpose of providing working code is to make it easier for people to fill in the blanks you are missing. >> You'll be surprised at how few of the readers here have the Dover scores >> available, > <G> No I wouldn't. I'll bet almost all Lilypond users > have heard of Bach, but why should readers without > special needs or interest have Bach Dover scores? But I > would expect tho folks who do have such scores to easily > recognize my problem from the "extract" that I gave, and > reproduce above. Some piece of LilyPond code that does not compile, and that even if it did compile were missing what you want to see? I think you are overestimating people's abilities... > I am Attaching a .jpg of a small chunk of a download that > I got from IMSLP, that illustrates the Bach Gesellschaft > practice. I am fairly sure that the Mailman SW will > strip this Attachment, I don't know why it should. Looks like it appeared just fine on the list. Have to be off now, so won't reply with anything more useful right now. I think we might have discussed this problem once already on the list but I don't know what code (if any) might have been waved around in the course of the discussion. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
