Hi David, I just tested that code with my version 2.17.24 - please see attached PNG. Hope this helps you narrow things down.
Ben [png] v2.17.24_-_Note_Splitting.png <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n151743/v2.17.24_-_Note_Splitting.png> David Kastrup wrote > Gilberto Agostinho < > gilbertohasnofb@ > > writes: > >> >> I think I found two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note >> splitting. >> >> 1) when a note has an accidental and it has to be split, the ligaturas >> look >> out of place. >> >> 2) when a note has an accidental (regular accidental, or forced >> accidental >> with an !, or even due to *dodecaphonic style*) and it has to be split, >> these accidentals appear in all repeated notes. > > >> So are these bugs or am I misusing the rhythm splitting? > > Bugs. Regressions. In 2.16.0, everything looks fine except for the > repeated forced accidentals (those have always been overlooked, I > guess). > > Bug squad, can you file the original report and the examples? And can > people who have some version of 2.17 installed narrow this in some more? > I don't really fancy bisecting all the way from 2.16. > > -- > David Kastrup > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ----- composer | sound designer -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Two-possible-bugs-when-dealing-with-Automatic-note-splitting-tp151739p151743.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
