>> I wonder why there is such a large gap between the clef and the >> time signature. Looks quite unnatural IMHO. > > Agreed. I think it's because the time sig is always placed in the > same location, and the clef is narrow, so it looks bad. See > attached annotated example.
Thanks for that. Definitely a bug :-) Do we have already an issue for that? Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user