Is it considered "bad behavior" to open up a github repository with Thorsten's contribution, and then apply the patches to it, for that to be considered the source of truth?
On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:33 AM, Marc Hohl <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 08.10.2013 06:23, schrieb Keith OHara: >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorley65 <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >>> 2013/10/8 Steve Noland <steve <at> thenolands.us>: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> On a Mac, when trying to compile the jazz-test-3.ly file, I get the >>>> following error from Lilypond re: the LilyJAZZ.ily file: >> >>> Try replacing #(define (jazz-keysig grob) ...) with Keith's suggestion: >>> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Pseudo-handwritten-font-tt142117.html#a147230 >>> >> >> Steve, could you put a link to that fix near wherever you found LilyJAZZ.ily >> ? >> >> The history is, I extended the key-signature print function last August, for >> development version 2.17.1 and eventually stable 2.18. Meanwhile Thorsten >> was >> probably working on LilyJAZZ, and had to depend on some undocumented >> internals >> of the old key-signature print function. In March he posted the version that >> works with stable LilyPond 2.16. >> >> Probably Thorsten, or any of us, will update his .ily file for version 2.18 >> when >> that comes out. > > AFAIK Torsten has not answered any mail request since the beginning of > August. I hope that this is does not imply any serious incidents ... > > But some more or less "official", easy to be found location with the > possibility to download (and update) code would be fine. > > Would it be an option to include the file and the fonts similarly to the > articulate script? > > Marc > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
