2013/10/18 SoundsFromSound <[email protected]>: > Janek & David N: > > Fantastic effort and a solid expansion idea for how to make a great function > even better. > > I can't speak to how this new version of \shape will fit into the LilyPond > language/code (i.e. if it will break or harm anything by adding it), but > from an end-user standpoint I think this would be excellent; I'd say > continue developing for sure. Very powerful addition from the looks of it. > > I'd be happy to contribute if that would help its progress.
Great! How much could you give? 2013/10/18 Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]>: > Hi Janek, > >> \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating >> publication-quality slurs. > > Is there any way that Lilypond could create "publication-quality slurs" > without \shape? ;) > >> After several days of work i'm proud to present: >> - ability to use input shorthands when specifying offsets with \shape, >> - a version of \shape using polar coordinates. > > Nice! > >> I'd like to hear your opinions. Do you like it? Should it be added >> to official LilyPond distribution? > > (* 2 Yes) ;-) >> Would anyone want to sponsor further development? > > Yes. > Especially if it includes my pet feature request: a reinstatement of the > #'attachment positioning option(s) that got lost around v2.4. That's possible, but i don't know how long it would take me. Could you send me a few examples of the old behavior (lilypond code, lilypond output, documentation) so that i could quickly estimate the difficulty of the task? thanks! Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
