Am 22.10.2013 12:18, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes:
Am 22.10.2013 11:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
Again: you are making an editorial decision here. There are several
valid decisions you can make. The important thing is _documenting_ your
decision so that
a) the reader knows which pitch to play
b) the reader knows what was originally written
The latter point is only relevant when doing a critical edition, and
particularly relevant when doing an Urtext.
Exactly. That's why I'm actually asking this question. From the
readabil- and unambigu-ity point of view I would have managed to do it
alone.
So where is the problem?
Nowhere anymore.
I wasn't sure if the situation in the original edition is wrong or only
impractical.
_Now_ I know it's the latter.
Thanks again
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
