Joshua Nichols <[email protected]> writes:
> I want to apologize for inciting any frustration... I guess in my small
> mind (with limited understanding of TeX systems and the like) I thought
> when a particular documentation supported using a command that I associate
> with LaTeX, (such as the preverbal \begin and \end commands) I assumed
> someone was saying LaTeX recognizes it.
We changed the syntax at some point to be more compatible with that
manner of operation (it was \begin[options]{lilypond} at some point of
time). But as long as nobody puts in the work for writing something
like lilypond-book.sty that does the hard work, that's more or less
cosmetic.
It _should_ have made you suspicious that no custom package was loaded
in the examples...
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
