On 20.11.2013, at 12:25, Urs Liska <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > please consider the situation in the attached (or inline?) image. > > <eecjhibe.png> > > a chord is repeated an octave higher, which is indicated by an \ottava. > Does the repeated chord need accidentals or not? > Both accidentals in the first chord are necessary (not reminder) accidentals, > so the repeated chord actually has _different_ notes and should need > accidentals of its own. But somehow it seems ridiculous to print them again > at the same staff position. > > Are there rules for this? Do you have any opinions? Gould's gut feeling says you should "repeat an accidental if sounding at a different octave, even when the same pitch is used with an octave sign".
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
