Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: > 2013/11/24 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >> Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> This is mentioned in >>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes >>> - is that example not clear enough? How should we improve it? >> >> Maybe an interface that's easier to remember? >> >> \beforeBreak \shape ... >> \afterBreak \shape ... >> \shape ... ( >> >> with the ability to leave off any specification and/or use any order of >> \shape commands. Yes, that's clearly not 2.18 material. But probably >> worth thinking about. > > Interesting idea, but what about slurs that are broken multiple times?
\beforeBreak #1 \shape ... > On the other hand, such situation is quite rare... -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
