David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes: > LilyPond's strengths are what it is able to do automatically: > transpositions, partial partitures, catering to different page formats, > fast adaption to different orchestras... Your score is _malleable_.
LilyPond excels at *vertical* malleability, but it's nearly disastrous when it comes to horizontal malleability, as I recently opined in another thread. Changes to metrical structure, and adding/deleting bars, are difficult, if not excruciating. I would argue that these tasks are at least as common, if not more common, then the ones you mention here. hjh _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
