Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup <[email protected]> schrieb: >> >>We need to figure out how we can provide "style sheets", similar to how >>LaTeX makes it possible to define "document classes" (layout >>definitions >>and tools) and "packages" (raw functionality packaged into coherent >>interfaces). >> >>Moving in the direction where this is possible also takes some pressure >>of stable/unstable development and features/fixes: something which >>comes >>in its own, optionally used file is not disruptive to the core >>stability. >> > > You can imagine that I like this idea ;-) > Would also make it more straightforward for editors to implement > functionality based on LilyPond or Scheme code that's not part of > LilyPond itself. > > Is this just a thought or has there already been discussion about this?
I think this has been mentioned a few times as an idea. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
