hi kieren,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Kieren MacMillan < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > When a Staff is populated by \partcombine, it is often difficult to > tell/remember who is playing right after a page-break. (n.b., Unlike > percussion or vocal staves, it isn’t normal practice to change the > shortInstrumentName of a \partcombine-d Staff.) > > I’ve seen several scores recently (including the *spectacular* new > Breitkopf/Henle Brahms’ symphonies > http://www.breitkopf.com/inventory/werk/8788?sr.epochen=&sr.isbn=&sr.weltlich=false&sr.query=brahms+henle+symphonie&was=1%2C4&sr.besetzungen=&sr.geistlich=false) > in which multi-instrument staves will include a disambiguating mark where > necessary: e.g. on a Staff with two parts (say, Flutes 1 & 2), a two-note > chord would have no mark, whereas a single line would say “1.” or “2.” or > “unis.”, as appropriate. > > What would be required to make Lily do this relatively easily? Would it be > a Scheme engraver? Or [major] changes to \partcombine itself? > > i posted almost the same question in october: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-10/msg00482.html (and http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-10/msg00324.html ) and got no answer. maybe this time... :) i've just run into a similar issue in another score (solo in oboeI which goes over multiple systems). regards, sb
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
