bart deruyter <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks David, but what do you mean with > 'factor out the hard-coded page builder?' I have no clue what that is > about, scheme? Never worked with it before.
No, C++. The target is customizable Scheme, but the current implementation is rigid C++. > I think horizontally stacking of footnotes is very useful, I'll add it to > the feature requests (my first :-) ). Don't get your hopes up for a timely implementation. Basically the whole footnote implementation needs to be designed properly. At the current point of time, it is an after-the-thought hack into the page breaker. And of course, the existence of this hack decreases the pressure to basically do this again almost from scratch. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
