On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 19:01 +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
> For example, they may create the score with Denemo and then export the
> lilypond file, but they cannot check the quality of the file. I'd
> suggest them to try to submit their file to the mutopia-discuss list
> and see if someone can clean the input. Personally, I'd be glad to
> contribute this way.
Better would be to write a command for Denemo that adds the
mutopia-required headers. A more serious problem would be Denemo users
who have no understanding of the LilyPond output, they will not be using
the \repeat { ..... } format as it requires placing the first part of
the construct at a place where nothing may appear in the typeset file
(e.g. at the beginning).
So they will generate LilyPond files with
\set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta "1"))
and such like, which make reading the LilyPond output harder. I don't
think there would be a practical way round that.
Richard
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
