David Kastrup <[email protected]> schrieb: >Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > >> David Kastrup <[email protected]> schrieb: >>>Colin Tennyson <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> The LillyPond parser accepts this, there is no error, and the score >>>_is >>>> rendered correctly_. >>>> But as you point out: >>>> this: >>>> << \addKey \staffOneNotes >> >>>> is better written as: >>>> { \addKey \staffOneNotes } >>>> >>>> >>>> While the { ... } notation is better, LilyPond accepts both: { >>>\addKey >>>> \staffTwoNotes } and << \addKey \staffTwoNotes >>. In this case >both >>>are >>>> rendered the same. >>> >>>But that's not a given. Take, for example, the output of >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>>Also, if you have something like >>> >>>\new StaffGroup >>>{ >>> << \key c\major { c' c' c' c' } >> >>>} >>> >>>you'll likely be surprised by the results... >> >> Colin, your example works because you have exactly one music >> expression inside the angled brackets. > >\addKey \staffOneNotes are _two_ music expressions. I used exactly the >same template for demonstrating things that don't work. > >> These let you enter multiple expressions that are interpreted in >> parallel. And if there is just one expression inside it just does >> nothing. > >But that's not what we had here.
Ok, sorry for not having looked close enough. -- Urs Liska openlilylib.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
