2014/1/5 David Kastrup <[email protected]> > I think that extending the tunings for "unorthodox" tunings is pretty > pointless since that makes finding the needed information harder, and > since it results in basically random selection of predefined tunings. > > The point here is more that it is _trivial_ to do your own tuning, by > writing something like > > \new TabStaff \with { stringTunings = \stringTuning <c, g, d g b d'> } > { ... } > > It is much faster to write this down rather than searching through > preexisting tuning tables to find a particular unorthodox tuning. >
I agree. But a custom tuning generator in Frescobaldi wizard would be nice: https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/342
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
