> Or from the computer-based point of view: Is anything wrong with
> choosing a staff size of 19.1?

>From the computer-based view, no. From the typography-based view, yes.
Something as small as that won't likely make a difference, but the further
from its intended size you force a glyph the worse it looks.


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Noeck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I try to answer my own mail after having searched the internet for answers:
>
> > 1. Is there a world wide standard for staff sizes?
>
> No.
>
> > 2. Are "Rastral Staff Sizes" always the same? I once found a different
> > list of rastral sizes. The differences are on the level of 2%, but I
> > wonder if there is some official reference.
>
> No. The idea is always the same but there are several different values
> around. Some agree and differ only because they are rounded differently
> to fractions of mm or inches. A comparison will follow from my side.
>
> > 3. Why does LilyPond suggest other staff sizes?
> >
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-size.html
> > Where do they come from?
>
> They follow a logarithmic/exponential law:
>   size(n) = 10 pt * 2^(n/6)
> Where pt is the TeX-pt 1/72 inch = 25.4 / 72 mm.
> The Feta font names are rounded except for the 25.2 which is rounded up
> to 26 (probably to make clear, that the interval does not get smaller
> again).
>
> > 4. Are "Rastral Staff Sizes" just a result of the fact that the tools
> > for hand-engraved music can not scale arbitrarily?
> > Or from the computer-based point of view: Is anything wrong with
> > choosing a staff size of 19.1?
>
> I suppose the staff sizes can be chosen freely. It is advisable to chose
> from a suggested range.
>
> Cheers,
> Joram
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to