Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > Am 24.01.2014 21:29, schrieb Janek Warchoł: >> Hi Urs, >> >> 2014/1/24 Urs Liska <[email protected]>: >>> All non-standard stuff is just as I want it except one: >>> The secondary beam at the last (the smaller) bes should be closer to the >>> main beam in order _not_ to clash with the thicker beam. >>> >>> So which grob and which property do I have to override to move that beamlet? >> >> \override Beam #'length-fraction = #0.5 >> > > Thanks. That's indeed the solution. > >> Small wonder you couldn't find it... I don't know who chose this >> name, but it's definitely nuts! > > I'd rather say the question is how this got through review ...
What review? Reviews are very spotty, and mostly focus on technical details. No users are providing any usability feedback in the LilyPond code reviews. And settings like these are more likely than not ushered in without separate mention in the course of larger changes in typesetting algorithms. So one actually needs to read through the code and/or well-known files containing changed/added properties and hopefully their documentation to give feedback _before_ such things appear in a developer version. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
