Am 19.02.2014 19:11, schrieb Phil Holmes:
----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4:30 PM Subject: What is LilyPond's ideal of "classical music engraving" ?Howdy! I am starting to investigate how Ties and Slurs should look according to the statement on lilypond.org that lilypond "creates beautiful sheet music following the best traditions of classical music engraving." I was looking at a couple of engravings, Ralph Kirkpatrick's Shirmer Goldberg and the OpenGoldberg.... the more engraving's I look at, computer generated or not, the more I realize how good LilyPond is... So where is an example of good historical engraving that is diverse enough in its content so as to be representative of that model that LilyPond seeks to emulate? -steveI would say one thing: that in terms of consistency, LilyPond outperforms a number of earlier pieces of engraved music hands down. I was having a look at the Augener version of "Six Shropshire Songs" by Butterworth and the ties in that would drive Janek round the bend. Asymmetrical, not even level, no consistency where they start or finish. I do think it's possible we're getting over-critical, just because computers can be so perfect.
We were trying to copy the style of a hand-engraved U.E. score recently. And when looking at it closely I was really astonished about all the typographical imperfections.
Which also gives an idea about manual imperfections not necessarily being a bad thing.
Urs
-- Phil Holmes _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
