Daniel Rosen <[email protected]> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Phil Holmes [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:50 AM >> To: Daniel Rosen; LilyPond User Group >> Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book >> >> Then I'm confused as to why you had me update bin/book_latex.py at all. >> The >> output above is exactly the same as what I originally reported: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00452.html >> >> DR >> ========================================================= >> >> Because other developers are. I was talking you through how it might be >> possible for you to provide a testing point for one of them. > > So does that mean that I can tell David I've tested his patch and it > doesn't work for me?
I'm pretty sure that you did not test this patch: your changes apparently were not picked up by your version of lilypond-book. While I won't rule out that the patch may carry problems of its own, it would be quite unlikely that it did not at least cause a different error message. Since I do not have an idea about the anatomy of a Windows installation, we will depend on a) you figuring out what other copy of book_latex.py you should rather have patched b) someone else figuring this out c) a release of 2.19.3 after which we'll get more definite feedback. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
