Piaras: looks wonderful, thanks for sharing. >> haven't added it (it shouldn't be too difficult) as I tend to prefer >> functions that don't have long lists of arguments which I can never >> remember :)
It is *possible* to have optional arguments with default values: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/scheme-function-definitions and http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/scheme-function-usage Though in this case, a wrapper (like Urs suggested) is probably not a bad idea. My scheme is a bit rusty (actually, it was never that good), but I'm going to take a closer look at it as soon as I have time. / Fredrik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
