Is that really true? I've seen this notation regularly. What the composers seem
to intend - and what is easily understood - is that the slur indicates that the
grpup logically belongs to the _next_ note while the position before the
barline tells to okay _before_ the beat.
David Raleigh Arnold <[email protected]> schrieb am 27.03.2014:
>On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:16:51 +0100
>Urs Liska <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> consider the attached image.
>> Apart from the problematic slur which I don't want to deal with
>> right now, how can I typeset the acciaccatura _before_ the
>> barline.
>>
>> I was thinking of hacking something with \afterGrace, but
>> that's not what it is.
>
>But that is what it is. The legatura (slur) should attach to a
>previous something in the previous measure if
>you want the grace before the beat. If that is not what
>you mean, omit the legatura and just use small notes. What
>you want would have notes before the beat which the legatura
>mark indicates to be played on the beat. That is a
>self-contradiction, and therefore ambiguous.
>Regards, Rale
--
Diese Nachricht wurde mit <a
href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.onegravity.k10.pro2";><b>K-@
Mail</b></a> gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
