At 15:48 18/04/2014 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 18.04.2014 15:38, schrieb Brian Barker:
No - certainly not (though I know people who do!). You are quite
right not to believe I could be that foolish. But there is still a
difference in the representations: in musical notation, a note on
the F line after a key signature of G major represents an F#; in
Lilypond notation, an F after \key g\major represents F natural.
This is because the score is already a graphical representation.
No - that surely makes no difference? Both musical notation and
Lilypond notation *could* work the other way around - if anyone were
to prefer this. (Note that I've expressed no such preference!)
... in Amadeus you'll write the pitch you _see_ and not the one you hear.
I also would not ever want to change LilyPond's behaviour in that
respect, but I write this to show that there _are_ people (who have
to be taken seriously) who would consider the other approach superior.
Exactly (but I'm still fence-sitting).
Brian Barker
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user