2014-05-27 10:31 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska <[email protected]>: > But I'd still propose to include it in the snippets repository as soon as > possible. "Our" repository is significantly different from LilyPond itself, > and also from the official LSR. Having incomplete, buggy or experimental > snippets in it is perfectly OK as long as they are documented accordingly. > And as I said earlier LilyJAZZ is already out in the wild, used, discussed > and asked for, but presumably in a number of personal variations, with > people having applied all kinds of personal improvements or patches. > Having it in the oll snippets would provide > - a common reference location to point interested people to > - an "authoritative" "latest version" > - a convenient central place for development > where everybody can add his improvements. >
+1!
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
