Hi, 2014-07-10 19:25 GMT+02:00 tisimst <[email protected]>: > All, > > Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in binary form > (i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make other music > fonts available by forcing them to have a metafont source file. I guess that > could be nice, but it seems like so much work to do that. I have about 4 or > 5 alternate music fonts that people could use and I certainly don't want to > convert them to metafont. They are currently designed and built with > fontforge. > > What do you think?
Does fontforge have its own format that contains a "source-like" description of the fonts? (i have no idea how it works, all my font work was with Metafont) Maybe we could distribute that? I'd say that it's important to distribute the fonts in a format that is most accessible for modification, but if all we have is binary files, then we have to live with that. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
