Marc Hohl <[email protected]> writes: > There was some discussion about making the interface more user-friendly > and allow for aliases, but there is no final consensus yet IIRC. > Moreover, the problem with repeat sections, for example > > c4 c c c \bar "||" > \break > \repeat volta 2 { d4 d d d } > > was not covered at all yet.
That would imply that having a single bar type for pre-/post-/no-break might not wholly cut it. Instead we might need to differentiate pre- and post-break and provide recipes/kerns to construct the no-break variant somewhat reliably. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
