I found some related ugliness. If the spacers are changed to rests, the
problem goes away.
<<
{ c'4 s2. c'4 s2. c'8 s2.. c'16 s2... }
{ R1*4 }
>>
Using transparent rests won't work for me because I need a beam extending
over the whole top staff, like so:
{ c'8[ s2.. c'8 s2.. c'8] s2.. }
A rest breaks the beam and a spacer breaks the spacing, so I'm stuck.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Neil Thornock <[email protected]>
wrote:
> The double whole rest forces the measure too wide in this example, as if
> making room for notes that aren't there. Any ideas how to shorten the
> measure up to be, at least, no longer than the other measures?
>
> <<
> { c'4 s1.. c'4 s1.. c'4 s1.. }
> { \time 8/4 c'4 r r2 r1 R\breve c'4 r r2 r1 }
> >>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
