On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Jay Vara <j...@diljun.com> wrote: > > > >> I wonder two things: >> >> (1) Is there a way to combine the notes and rests in the 1/4 division of >> the bars? >> > > Not sure what you mean. >
In the example below, it looks strange that there are two tied eighth-note Gs instead of a single quarter-note. The engraver ought to combine them, especially since I asked for 1/4. (It does this when the division is 2/8 as well.) > >> (2) Why the inconsistency in the rests in the 3/8 divisions? >> Quarter-eighth is correct. Why is this reversed the second time? >> >> I think what it has done is correct. It is reversed the second time > because in that case the first rest is split into eights by the > Completion_rest_engraver. Whatever rest occurs on the barline is split and > no attempt is made to correct the input. Is this not what you expect? > I'm expecting the result to be notated correctly, and this snippet isn't. The 3/8 division of the bar should be notated with a dotted-quarter rest (or in older practice a quarter rest followed by an eighth). An eighth followed by a quarter rest is incorrect. For me this sort of thing would be a deal-breaker with using the completion engraver with compound meters. These are errors I'd like to be able to correct, and you can't do it here. At least not that I know of. --David
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
