> On 7 Oct 2014, at 01:12, MarcM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hans Aberg-2 wrote
>>> I know using '#' would not work due to conflict with scheme but what >>> about >>> using the Unicode symbols? >> >> It works, in fact I have already done that [1] (after downloading the >> files, change the names to what is listed on the page), but it has not >> been integrated into LilyPond. >> >> LilyPond does not have operators: ♯ and ♭ are a part of note names. When >> having microtonal accidentals, there becomes too may names to write them >> all out. But it is possible to add more languages, would LilyPond get >> that. >> >> 1. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2011-11/msg00420.html > > Great minds think alike. I notice your post is from 2011, was there an issue > adding it to lilypond? I didn’t try to add it myself, and I do not know why it was not added - perhaps no strong interest. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
