My first thought is...that's a really bad idea. But maybe there is some reason to do it that I had not considered...
Tim From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 10/16/2014 01:32 PM Subject: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 143, Issue 103 Sent by: [email protected] Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Bass and Treble Clef notes on the same clef (Knute Snortum) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:32:19 -0700 From: Knute Snortum <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Bass and Treble Clef notes on the same clef Message-ID: <CALmeJxT8q8Kc_Vknu-=a2kQAMtFX6xGzrzRMeNcr+ic=foa...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a situation I don't know how to deal with in LilyPond. I have bass clef and treble clef notes on the same staff. I guess one way to do it is to create a markup and a small bass clef sign and put it next to the treble clef (and incorrect) gf which looks like a tied bf from the bass clef in the first measure. I could make a temporary ossia-type staff to hold the bf pedal tone. Any other thoughts? [image: Inline image 1] Knute Snortum (via Gmail)
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
