Urs Liska wrote > Am 02.01.2015 um 20:35 schrieb tisimst: >> No complaints? That's not a problem. > > Maybe this is because nobody (who noticed the post) really understands > the implications? > > Urs
That's fair. The implication is this: If you need to use more than the standard glyph set (e.g., the common noteheads, clefs, articulations, time signature numerals, accidentals, etc.) then you may have to use Emmentaler instead of, say, Haydn, or at least a mixture of the two. The biggest examples of this are the shape-note noteheads and ancient chant glyphs (i.e., petrucci, kievan, etc.). Does that make more sense? -Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Alternative-fonts-glyph-support-tp169988p170043.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
