Hello Grey, How will you « mix », so to say, LP scores with files from remix software, and how can a user modify/enrich music produced by the latter directly on the web site, without having these software installed on their workstation?
JM > Le 21 févr. 2015 à 18:20, Grey <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Taste is somewhat a broad term but pretty much. > > I could estimate 5 ways it's going to be use. > > 1. re-composition of existing piece (same instruments) > 2. new composition (different instrument) > 3. new composition (remix/cover) > 4. listening in general > 5. new composition in general > > In regard to number 3, if you were to think in terms of what a composition > is, you could say writing musical score is a form of a remix of a song, > therefor I think their will be a section for just those who does the > remix/cover but doesn't exactly use musical score but uses remix software* > fruityloop, garageband, logic pro* etc etc. If you were to look at it in > terms of that, these software produces their own "musical scores" and it > would be fair to share them with other users who uses similar software. > > I could only imagine many people having a fun time building upon each other > piece, and it might even get somewhat addicting depending on if you're an > enthusiast or not. It might just be me, but so far I haven't seen a site > with the right UI out there yet for this, let me know if I"m wrong. > > Call it the home of networking for musical composition. There are many sites > out there like this already but the popular ones are embedded only for their > technology such as noteflight. I want to keep the site as a "free software". > The other second thing would be their search feature and how the results are > organize, it isn't made for composition purpose. > > Also to put this out there now. The second goal of the site is the > contribution back to the original artist. The UI made it simpler to be able > to backtrack to the original artist (not user) and depending on how much > views/listen or whatever, it would make sense financially to give me the > money back to the artist. If any big artist ever decide they want to post > their music on the site and sell it (digital copies), they can keep all > their commission. Royalty rates and all that things are annoying, I made > sure to include 3 other options (in the mockup) that could fund the site > with highest return rates (hopefully). > > It's pretty much a site around mutual relationship between artist and > benefiting the artist financially or through exposure, based around musical > scores. I could only imagine the backend to be somewhat complex for the long > term goal of giving back financially to the original artist. > > I hope that answer you question. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-hackathon-challenge-to-popularise-Lilypond-anyone-tp172123p172132.html > Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
