> From: Simon Albrecht <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Bug in articulate.ly
>
> > Another example is that you could indicate "tempo rubato" and then
> > specify as interpretation one of the many possible actual tempo(s) that
> > would be used for rendering the MIDI.
> If I may chime in with my opinion on this: there may be some point in
> translating articulations into midi, but tempo rubato is in itself meant
> to be subjective and thus marks the point where a human performer cannot
> and must not be replaced by a machine. Thus I find the sketched approach
> more than a little absurd, if you permit the remark.
>

Permit me to suggest that you lower your standards.

The practical reality is that, even in a human performance, a passage
marked "rubato" will actually take a specific, measurable amount of time.

If one's purpose is to render MIDI that approximates such a performance,
you can choose, as an editor/interpreter, to instruct the MIDI output to
consume that amount of time.  I agree that adding randomness into this
definition probably does not achieve much.

But it is absolutely useful to tweak MIDI output.  There is a great deal of
useful difference between some control and none, even if the results are
far from passing a Turing test.



> It?s neither
> possible, nor rewarding, nor even desirable to substitute real music
> making by electronic simulation, (at least for most kinds of music, and
> certainly every music which can be reasonably typeset with lilypond
> belongs in this category).
>

Well, in the 21st century, computers have pretty much become instruments in
their own right.

Which is to say, lilypond can be a way to control such an instrument.

It is probably the case the vast majority of the music people hear in film
& tv scores with orchestral instruments is "played" on virtual
instruments.  Composers end up actually writing more for those instruments
(playing to their strengths, avoiding their weaknesses) than with actual
acoustic instruments and performers in mind.

So, I think that lilypond being able to control virtual instruments is a
pretty practical goal.


Yours,

David Elaine Alt
415 . 341 .4954                                           "*Confusion is
highly underrated*"
[email protected]
self-immolation.info
skype: flaming_hakama
Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to