On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, mulix wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1. configure script (either autoconf or some home-made script)
> > > > test:
> > >
> > > will someone familiar with the autoconf tools (tzafrir? shlomi?) be able
> > > to giveus an estimate of which is easier (writing our own conf script
> > > or using autoconf)?
> > >
> >
> > Actually, autoconf has very nice testing for determining if and where a
> > library is present, and it is the standard, so I suggest we use it.
>
> But will it require the use of automake as well?
>
We may be able to write a Makefile template ourselves, that can be served
as input to autoconf. However, automake is very nice and easy IMO, so I
don't see any reason why not to use it.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
> --
> Tzafrir Cohen
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Haifa Linux Club Projects Mailing List (http://linuxclub.il.eu.org)
> To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
Home E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A more experienced programmer does not make less bugs. He just realizes
what went wrong more quickly.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haifa Linux Club Projects Mailing List (http://linuxclub.il.eu.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
