On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > o Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees. Need assignment. > > Reviewed BSP review, need to send results to Loïc et al. > > It would be great to see more MX51 things on ALKML (and devicetree > things on devtree-discuss). Up to now I have the impression that there > is still much work done behind closed doors, which is bad if we want to > have better mainline support for i.MX5x.
That's a good point and there's nothing behind closed doors happening that I have requested -- in fact, I mandate the opposite. I would assume that Jeremy has been posting device tree mx51 work to the devtree-discuss ML, and that mx51 patches coming out of the KWG and PMWG are also posted to ALKML; correct me if I'm wrong. It may be that it's just very little happening :-/ -- Christian Robottom Reis | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | http://launchpad.net/~kiko Linaro Engineering VP | [ +1] 612 216 4935 | http://async.com.br/~kiko _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
