Hi Shawn, On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:20:30PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > I'm using lp:~linaro-maintainers/linaro/live-helper.config.maverick.headless > to build the rootfs image for imx51, and running into the following > problems.
> - Need --force-yes apt option > I have to get APT_OPTIONS="--yes --force-yes" in common to keep the > build going, otherwise it will end up with the following error. > E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes > Build log is attached for your checking. Are you still seeing this problem? From the log, I notice the following: > P: Setting up cleanup function > P: Begin caching bootstrap stage... > P: Begin bootstrapping system... > W: skipping bootstrap > P: Begin caching bootstrap stage... > P: Begin unmounting filesystems... > P: Setting up cleanup function > P: Begin caching chroot stage... You appear to have a cached bootstrap result here that lh is using. Is the problem reproducible after running 'lh clean --all'? > W: GPG error: http://ports.ubuntu.com maverick Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 > W: GPG error: http://ports.ubuntu.com maverick-security Release: The > following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not > available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 > W: GPG error: http://ports.ubuntu.com maverick-updates Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 This is supposed to be addressed by the inclusion of the ubuntu-keyring package in the chroot; however, this package is only included by the 'chroot_sources' script *after* running 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade', which means that if the bootstrapped chroot is out of date (for instance, if you're using a cached chroot), this will fail *before* the keyring package is installed. So clearing out your cache will probably fix this problem for you. > - OMAP build binding > The current config is binding to OMAP build without hwpack. What is > the plan to support hwpack build and other platforms like imx51 as far > as I'm concerned right now? I believe that's been addressed now :) Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
