On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com> wrote: > [..] > > That being said, I'm not against $SUBJECT patch, but I question it's > usefulness in terms of PM. What's more valuable for PM is the statitics > and knobs exported on a per-device level by the runtime PM core (and > AFAICT, already included into tools like powertop.) > IIRC, Vincent's suggestion is more valid for the HW guys who want to test out all kinds of possibilities *before* the OS and the support for the drivers becomes mature enough to concentrate on statistics and so on. Even I remember our HW guys requesting for bersek controls over regulators and clocks as a part of platform validation, when the OS was not mature enough in terms of a complete system-support.
Cheers! _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
