On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:47:20 +0000, Jamie Bennett <jamie.benn...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 24 January 2011 20:49, Michael Hudson-Doyle > <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:22:45 +0000, Jamie Bennett > > <jamie.benn...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >> The current thoughts are to increase the package count and download > >> size by adding a number of developer focused packages. > > > > Once we have the smaller image and this developer image (both of which I > > see the need for), what is the use case for the current headless image? > > Basically Headless would go away. These two images are being proposed > to replace the > Headless image which is neither small nor feature-ful. Hopefully the > new images will > address the specific needs of two different target audiences better.
That makes sense. +1 then. Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
