On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Mirsad Vojnikovic < mirsad.vojniko...@linaro.org> wrote:
> ... > I think this looks good. Is this the JSON file definition we will use > initially? Asking this because the corresponding Dispatcher WI is set to > done "[qzhang] Define the job description both on dispatcher and scheduler: > DONE". I will need at least initial version to work with on Scheduler parts. > Yes, let's get this documented and go with it for now. I talked to zyga on irc about it and he seemed happy with the last thing I proposed. It will probably need some tweaking, but I think that should be pretty close unless someone can see a reason why this won't work? > > Also, I wonder if we will support more complex test jobs involving more > than one board, either of the same type or different types? If yes, how will > the Dispatcher handle those? Should we put that in queue as a single job or > as multiple jobs? How will that affect JSON file definition? > > We don't really have any tests at the moment that would require that, so it's purely speculation at this point. If it's just a matter of needing a server to run against, we may *want* to have a stable server to use for things like this, and just have them all use the same thing rather than deploying a second machine to act as a server. If it's really a test with two component parts, it may make more sense to launch them as separate jobs. I think that would be a reasonable approach, but lets revisit it when/if we have something that absolutely requires it, rather than spend a lot of time trying to design around something we don't have need for right now anyway. Thanks, Paul Larson
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
