On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Amit Kucheria <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're required to cc [email protected] for all patches that we send
> upstream. bzr/launchpad users are already covered or will be shortly.
>
> For those using git-send-email to send patches (and you really should
> be), it might make sense to use the following command so you don't
> forget
>
> $ git config --global --add sendemail.bcc "[email protected]"
>
> Check $HOME/.gitconfig to make sure you see "bcc = [email protected]"
> under the [sendemail] section.
> WARNING - this will bcc [email protected] on all patches from that
> machine sent using git-send-email.
>
> If you want more control, and your linaro work happens in a single git
> tree, you could do the following:
>
> $ cd <your linaro git tree>
> $ git config --add sendemail.bcc "[email protected]"
>
> Check <your linaro git tree>/.git/config for the bcc entry as above.
> Now patches send from that tree will be bcc'ed to patches@linaro.
>
> /Amit
> p.s. There is also a sendemail.cc instead of sendemail.bcc in case you
> want to use that.
>

Do we need a policy on whether or not to use Bcc here?

One argument for using Bcc is that it avoids replies from subscribers
to the destination mailing lists from also being CC'd to
[email protected].  Can your analysis cope with [email protected]
receiving a whole thread, or do we need to be careful about this?

Cheers
---Dave

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to