On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 1 March 2011 20:45, Jamie Bennett <jamie.benn...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 01/03/11 at 01:25pm, Tom Gall wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett <jamie.benn...@linaro.org> >>> wrote: >>> > https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MonthlyMilestones > >> If agreed I would propose that all projects use the milestone names and >> dates in the above link in their launchpad projects. Blueprints and work >> items can then target these milestones > > That would be an annoying format change for toolchain group > releases, which are already on a monthly schedule and currently > use "2011.03" for milestone names, and "2011.03-0" (-1, -2 ...) > for release versions. Is anybody actually currently using the > milestone names in the wiki page above? If not, wouldn't it make > more sense to standardise on the format we're already using? > (Plus, two digit years? Very retro...)
Hi Peter. We'll keep the 2011.xx-y names for the products. Each project has product series and a planning series. The product series are ones like '4.5' or '4.4' for gcc-linaro, and 'trunk' for qemu-linaro, and these then have milestones like '2011.03'. The planning series are named after the planning cycle such as '11.05' and have milestones like '11.05-final', '11.05-alpha2', and so on. The planning series names and dates are consistent across all of Linaro and let the PM people collapse the data into a whole of Linaro view. Every blueprint we plan to complete this cycle should be accepted for the 11.05 series and at least targeted at the 11.05-final milestone. There is a wart though - say we plan to finish blueprint 'x' by the March release. Do we assign it to the product 2011.03 milestone or the otherwise identical planning 11.05-foo milestone? -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
