On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:07:05AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On 29 March 2011 10:53, Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Konstantinos, > > > There must be some misunderstanding here; no license that prohibited > > distribution of binaries built from modified source would be considered a > > Free Software license, and zlib is certainly considered free. :) > > Yes, you're right, the problem is that a modified zlib would have to be > clearly > marked as different -ie the package name would have to be different.
Well, Debian zlib is already modified, hence the "dfsg" in the source and binary versions. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
