To be added to that list in the yet-to-be-named rediculously small image as well as linaro-server.
Linaro-server hopefully we'll see added to the daily snapshots fairly soon as I have the seed etc already put together for it. pico or whatever it will be called is probably a bit further off. But getting back to your question, I don't think we should produce prebuilt images for all derivations. I would pick the most popular image and couple of the most popular board types as a start. If lots of people download and there's clammering for more, than hopefully would be easy enough to adjust. That's my 2c. Regards, Tom On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Guilherme Salgado <guilherme.salg...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > During LDS we agreed to provide prebuilt Linaro images at our > milestones[1], for users who can't/won't run linaro-media-create. One > thing we forgot to discuss, though, is if it's worth doing so for all > image types or just for the LEB(s). > > Our downloads page (http://www.linaro.org/downloads/) has 4 different > image types, but the email for weekly testing, for example, lists only > UbuntuDesktop as official and the others as community images. More > importantly, though, I'm not sure the people who just want to try Linaro > quickly will be interested in anything other than UbuntuDesktop at this > point, so we might as well avoid the extra work to provide images that > are unlikely to be of any use. > > Can anybody think of other reasons why we should provide images of all > types? > > [1] https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/PrebuiltImages > > -- > Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado> > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-dev mailing list > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev > > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
