On 07/04/2011 10:25 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andy Green<andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote:
It would be less ridiculous than issuing monthly tarballs for the kernel
case.
why do you think that tarballs are ridiculous? even kernel.org
releases tarballs last I looked. IMO you can prefectly have tags +
tarballs coexist and everbody would be happy.
Because there are few or no people that want a fly frozen in amber for a
kernel divorced from its patch history and context to add patches to.
-Andy
--
Andy Green | TI Landing Team Leader
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs | Follow Linaro
http://facebook.com/pages/Linaro/155974581091106 -
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://linaro.org/linaro-blog
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
