On 13 September 2011 15:21, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011, James Westby wrote: >> What about taking a cue from gstreamer? >> good, bad and ugly >> I don't think we have the same division of them, but "ugly" could work, >> in a similar spirit to "dirty," but without some of the implications? > > [ The names of course come from the movie, but sometimes GStreamer > folks regretted picking these names because end-users didn't really > understand why they should run something "bad" or even "ugly". ]
I agree. I really don't like to use the terms bad or ugly to describe work. I think it sets the wrong tone. It sounds like staging is generally okay with people. I tend to take the view that its always possible to upstream the outstanding patches, though it may not be likely - the glass is half full, right? > > -- > Loďc Minier > -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
