On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:43:09PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:31:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
[Not being many off-SoC clocks] > > I dunno, I get the impression that some of this is due to the current > > limitations of the clock API rather than due to a lack of clocks - > > perhaps that's specific to the applications I look at, though. > > applications > The clk API per-se has nothing to do with how clocks are registered. > There are two things that are the clk API: Right, it's consumer side only which is the limitation I'm talking about - at the minute it's only possible to use the clk API for on-SoC clocks (or at least clocks that the SoC cares about), we don't have a clock API for cross platform clock providers. I don't know if getting a cross platform implementation will change that situation much. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
