On 22 November 2011 10:30, Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11/22/2011 10:45 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard<mans.rullg...@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 3 --- >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >> index fe18e27..427d27b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >> @@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ config ARCH_OMAP4 >> select CPU_V7 >> select ARM_GIC >> select LOCAL_TIMERS if SMP >> - select PL310_ERRATA_588369 >> - select PL310_ERRATA_727915 >> - select ARM_ERRATA_720789 >> select ARCH_HAS_OPP >> select PM_OPP if PM >> select USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI > > Mans thanks for bringing these to my attention. > > From what I can figure out from Santosh's comments I want the two PL310 > patches. I already had my own patch for limiting 4460 ES1.0 cache > workaround to that revision, although I'll happily deprecate it when yours > turns up in mainline.
Mainline has nothing at all for this, nor does linux-omap. > For this particular patch although it's fixed in 4460 CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4 is > also there for 4430. Am I right to take from your patch name we do need > these workarounds on 4430? Yes, the workarounds are needed on 4430. Ideally any workarounds which can be applied selectively at runtime should be done that way. If I have time, I might have a look at that, but no promises. -- Mans Rullgard / mru _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
