Hi Matthias, Over the Thanksgiving holiday the compile-o-rama complete for all the packages from the main and universe archives that had deps on libjpeg-dev. The results of the build can be found in my libjpeg-turbo ppa: https://launchpad.net/~tom-gall/+archive/libjpeg-turbo/+packages
In summary, 114 packages were rebuilt against the libjpeg-turbo's version of -dev. One package vtk resulted in the only 2 failures that have been experienced. One failure on x86, and one on x86_64. Both failures were caused not by problems with libjpeg-turbo but rather with poor build time deps specified in the package. This can be witnessed in the logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/85691287/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.vtk_5.6.1-7~linaro1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz https://launchpadlibrarian.net/85716285/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.vtk_5.6.1-7~linaro1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz I have also updated the raw performance numbers for libjpeg-turbo in our wiki. (I haven't updated the graphs yet) https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/LibJpeg8 All raw performance numbers are now from oneiric. I've also included numbers from a 3.3Gz i5-2500 to the mix as well numbers taken on the Quickstart board with the lib instructed to not use NEON. With SIMD for intel/arm environment performance is substantially better in all cases. With NEON off in libjpeg-turbo, performance is at least equal and in some cases better than libjpeg8. All that said, what is the next step? -- Regards, Tom "We want great men who, when fortune frowns will not be discouraged." - Colonel Henry Knox Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs w) tom.gall att linaro.org w) tom_gall att vnet.ibm.com h) tom_gall att mac.com _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
